For construction companies · October 2026

Dundir

Up to seventy percent of your project is procurement.

Dundir is designing a procurement solver and a jobsite gate for construction companies. Both are in development with design partners; nothing in this deck runs at a client yet.

The cost structure

Bought in, compared by hand.

The unit price gets optimised. That is rarely the biggest issue. Where is the material, when will it arrive, and is it certified?

Materials up to 70% of total project cost. Donyavi et al. 2024, in Hamppi 2025, p. 8 [EVID-001]

The problem

Office, gate and memory.

€8,354

Swing on one subcontractor’s total when a generative AI tool was given the same bids in a new session.

Hamppi 2025, Table 6, p. 62 [EVID-002]

<5%

of staff see a 500 to 600 million euro Dutch infrastructure project through from start to finish, an interviewee says. Supplier knowledge leaves with them.

Rockx 2023, p. 44 [EVID-005]

up to 50 mingatepaper ticket
The gate today: 70% of trucks wait up to 50 minutes, 95% of tickets have errorsAldeeb 2024 · Qflow 2025

Evidence: EVID-012, EVID-016

Procurement decisions Stage: research and design

Computing, not generating.

A language model writes an answer. An optimisation engine works one out.

Hard requirements are fixed first: certification, delivery date, budget ceiling, CO₂ limit. Price and reliability are weighed inside them, by weights you set. Same input, same answer, and the reasons written down at award.

price →↑ reliabilitydelivery dateCPR certifiedbudget ceilingCO₂ limitoptimum
Schematic of the design, no datasolver: research and design

The pilot

Ten weeks, starting from closed tenders.

No hardware and no ERP integration needed for the first result. Everything stays inside your network, under an NDA.

  • Week 1: intake. Three to five closed tenders with the quotations received and the award criteria.
  • Within 7 working days: recalculated. The closed tenders back, compared on your own criteria, with the reasoning next to the choice made at the time.
  • Weeks 3 to 8: alongside live tenders. Every difference between the advice and the buyer’s choice is logged and discussed.
  • Weeks 9 and 10: evaluation. Then a decision on a licence.

Where we stand

Stage, not product.

Module Stage
Procurement solver research and design
Smart gate lab prototype
Supplier record and contract memory design

What we have not proven yet. That the solver buys better than an experienced buyer. The literature supports the problem and the local design; the rest has to come from pilot data, and we do not have it yet.

What we are asking for

A pilot as a design partner.

  • Closed tenders. Three to five, with the quotations and your award criteria.
  • Your buyers’ time. A few hours a month of feedback, and candour when the advice is wrong.
  • A decision after ten weeks. On the logged differences, not on a promise.

Dundir

dundir.com · info@dundir.com

Sources

Aldeeb, N. F. F. 2024. “Die Bedeutung eines Online-basierten Avisierungssystems in der Versorgungslogistik.” Master’s thesis, TU Wien.
Hamppi, Joni. 2025. “Integrating AI into Procurement Processes in Construction.” Master’s thesis, Aalto University, School of Engineering. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/items/0abb3c95-dd08-4913-b563-6d34b21a6f44.
Qualis Flow. 2025. “The State of Data Quality in Construction: An Audit of 831,000+ Material Delivery Records.” Qualis Flow. https://www.qualisflow.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Qflow_DataQualityReport.pdf.
Rockx, Michiel. 2023. “Complexity and Risk Assessment in Dutch Infrastructure Projects.” Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology. https://repository.tudelft.nl/file/File_b11ed7b7-1b6f-46ae-b09f-359c0be4dcf8?preview=1.